Stursberg vs World, Part Two

From the Globe and Mail:

That’s it. The answers are “no” and “it is being sorted out.” And yet there is obviously something amiss. Maybe those complainants in News and Current affairs exaggerated. Maybe that “rancorous newsroom scrum” never happened. Maybe Stursberg was being very careful in his choice of words about “restructuring.”

But there’s no “maybe” about the vital importance of news and current affairs at CBC-TV. It is the benchmark by which CBC is measured and the marker of value to its core audience.

2 comments:

  1. Johnny Happypants
    Posted April 2, 2008 at 11:30 am | # | Reply to this masterpiece

    APRIL FOOLS!

  2. Anonymous
    Posted April 2, 2008 at 7:13 am | # | Reply to this masterpiece

    Wow, I actually agreed with Doyle there, and he wasn’t trying to make us look stupid. What gives?


Post a Comment

Your email is never shared.

Upload Files

You can include images or files in your comment by selecting them below. Once you select a file, it will be uploaded and a link to it added to your comment. You can upload as many images or files as you like and they will all be added to your comment.

Write for us